That’s not to suggest that the end is near, it just means it’s in sight. Your plane can crash into the ocean and you can be floating in the water with an island in sight and still sink to the ocean floor or get swallowed by a shark before you get there.

But last night I took a calendar and marked out when I’ll reach my goal weight (assuming I meet my interim goals) and that date is September 1st. Yes, that’s right, Gloria Estefan’s birthday.

I realize it’s a bit of a stretch to set a date almost 6 months in the future as my goal date. But I’ve been taking my time with this process and I don’t think I’ll have trouble meeting that deadline. I have a pretty simple system. I have daily goals and if I don’t meet them I just try a little harder. Of course when I do something like go on one of these ridiculous fad diets it can cause dramatic weight gains and losses, but I just tend to ignore that.

So that’s the goal. I’ll weigh 187 pounds on September 1st. From upwards of 300 pounds to 187. I’ve been taking pictures of the whole process so you’ll see the progression then.

Why 187 pounds? Because that falls into the healthy range according the height and weight charts MetLife came out with in 1943. Yes, I’m using the 1943 standard. You should too. (If you’re going to pay attention to any charts at all — and there’s really no reason to. It’s all arbitrary.) At least those charts take build into account, unlike the current BMI charts which seem to think that all 6 footers have identical builds.

There you have it. September 1st. The rhythm is going to get you. Then I’ll get you. The we’ll go get a 6 foot sub to celebrate my weight loss.

Happy New Year, my loves.  I trust you all had a good holiday. It’s been a while, almost a month since we last met. As I mentioned, I wasn’t giving weight loss much thought over the course of the holidays, so there wasn’t much to write about. And that’s kind of the beauty of having a blog that you don’t publicize: only a handful of people will notice when you go missing.

On a site like this it’s only natural to talk about New Year’s resolutions, but I don’t really make any. It’s odd, but tagging a goal with the word “resolution” seems to make it more unlikely that it’s going to happen. If your friend came up to you and said, “I’m going to take a cooking class this spring.” You’d think, That sounds like fun. But if they said, “My New Year’s resolution is to take a cooking class this spring.” You’d think, Yeah, we’ll see about that.

The other problem I have with New Year’s resolutions is that it promotes this kind of magical thinking about there being a special day to start stuff. We do this throughout the year when we say, “I’ll start on Monday.” I think when you decide you want to do something you should just go ahead and start at that moment. Not because “you might not live to see tomorrow” but because you want to get in the habit of your mind –and your choices– being what puts you in action, not some quirk of the calendar.

So this year I’m going to lose the rest of the weight that I want to.  I’ve toyed around with my weight for a few years now, but I think this year will see an end of that. Weight-loss is definitely an intriguing subject for me, and there is probably no better subject for anyone who is into self-experimentation, but I think I’ve played with it as long as I can. I met a girl last year who has become very important to me, she’s someone I could see myself spending a long time with, and it’s not really fair to her (or anyone else) to say, “Hey, I’m going to gain 100 pounds to see if I can then lose it by just eating  pre-packaged, processed foods that must contain white flour, processed sugar, and salt (although I think that would be a fun experiment). So I’m going to finish up this year and then I’ll find something else to experiment with. Hello heroin!

Christmas

It’s the most wonderful time of the year! That’s because it’s the time of year where I don’t actively think much about trying to lose weight.  That area between Halloween and New Year’s is the time when I think you shouldn’t worry too much about that kind of stuff. I realize that amounts to taking 2 months off every year, but ideally you want to someday take all your time off from actively dieting without gaining the weight back, so this two months is good practice.

I took this picture outside of Macy’s last night. We haven’t really had any snow in New York City yet, but it’s still a great time of year to be in the city.

Raw Food

I heard an interview this morning with somebody who was promoting the raw food vegan lifestyle. Which — if it’s not self-evident — means not only eating vegan, but not cooking anything. The argument is that our body wasn’t meant to digest cooked food and therefore it requires too much energy. That’s why you get tired in the middle of the day, they said. I don’t think I buy that. If eating cooked food made people sluggish and worn out, wouldn’t our ancestors have noticed it the first time they started eating cooked food? And wouldn’t they all have died out because all the slow, cooked-food eaters would be getting pounced on by mountain lions while the raw foodies would be sprinting through the plains.

Can any raw food proponents send me an email and answer that question? I’m not trying to be combative, I’m just curious. If we’re not supposed to eat cooked food, then why did we, as a species, almost universally start doing so?

Biggest Loser

Season Finale tonight. Get your bowl full of Extra Sugar-Free Gum and Jennie-O turkey meat and enjoy the show.

I don’t have time for a proper write-up, but for the sake of completion I wanted to make a post.  It was make-over week! But then again every week is make-over week on The Biggest Loser one would think. It was an okay episode. Nothing too exciting. At one point Tim Gunn from Project Runway (who was assisting with the make-overs) said to Rebecca, “You look like a movie star!” I was hoping and praying he would follow that up with, “The girl from Precious.” But no luck.

It was a double-elimination week this week on The Biggest Loser. And given some of the big numbers people were putting up, it looks like the contestants were doing some double-eliminating of their own –laxative style– if you know what I mean.

Also:

• It being a double-elimination week, the trainers were plotting ways to keep Shay in the game because she “needs to be here.” (I’m looking forward to them getting the news she got booted next week.) I was kind of hoping they would go out of their way to sabotage some of the other players. I was expecting some bizzarro-world versions of their typical product placement to screw with the others, i.e., “You know what’s a great substitute for Extra Sugar-Free Gum? Fudge.”
• Speaking of product placement. This week Bob told them all about how great and nutritious Lara Bars. But if they’re so great, why did he wait until week 9 to mention them?
• If I was ever going to go on this show I would drink a gallon of uranium before the first weigh in. A gallon of liquid uranium weighs around 144 pounds. Then you pee it out a little later and just like that you’ve lost almost 150 pounds in your first week on the ranch. And as far as I know, science has never said you shouldn’t consume uranium. Wait… let me wiki that… okay — check that — apparently it will kill you. Never mind.

For a couple weeks now I’ve  been wondering what the hell is going on with all the outbursts in the gym. Not just people breaking down physically, but people having these personal breakthroughs that have little to do with working out. Last week, Daniel discovered  that yes, he does really love his mother (or something like that) while walking on the treadmill nd he starts bawling.  Then this week, in the middle of a sit-up or something, Jillian asks Abby (whose entire family died in a car accident), “So, what’s it like to lose everything you love?” That’s a quote. That’s not me paraphrasing. A little while later she asked another contestant, “What’s it like to be the daughter of a heroin user?” This all seemed unusually manipulative for a show that is already pretty manipulative. Then I read yesterday that Jillian is getting her own show on NBC where she moves in with people and gets them in shape, so I guess what’s going on is they’re trying to make her seem like the thin, white Oprah in preparation for her new show. It all seems very awkward to me. I mean, if I’m bench-pressing and you’re spotting me, I don’t want you saying,  ”So, your dad molested you?” Can’t we just stick to, “You can do it!” or “Feel the burn!”

Also:

• “It’s our special guest, Derek Jeter!!!” Everyone freaks out. “On the jumbo-tron.” Cue sad trombone sound.
• I’m not sure I like when people finish challenges after they’ve already lost them. It doesn’t seem brave and courageous to me. It’s seems kind of sad and pathetic. I feel the same way I would feel if the Yankees –after their loss to the Phillies last night– decided to stay on the field and toss the ball to themselves and try and hit enough homers to “win” the game.
• The “special” guest who was actually there in person… celebrity chef Curtis Stone again! “Who?” again. Let me tell you, if you’ve been looking for a Gordon Ramsay without the personality, you’ve found it in Curtis Stone. He made a turkey burger between two big mushroom caps. You know, because it looks kind of like a hamburger. And really, when you’re trying to lose weight, that’s all that really matters. When choosing something to eat, first ask yourself, “Does this taste like S, but look like something I would like to eat if I was squinting at it through gauze?”

Any entrepreneurs out there looking for a business idea? Well, I’ve got one you can get in on the ground floor of. No, it’s not my idea to pour ranch dressing into the soil of a lettuce patch to see if we can grow salad-dressing-flavored lettuce. It’s something different entirely.

I don’t go to a gym. I get all my exercise at home or playing sports or walking around the city. But while watching The Biggest Loser last week I realized there are a lot of overweight people who want to use the gym but are intimidated by all the skinny people there. So I feel like someone should open a gym that you have to be 50 pounds overweight to join. You don’t get kicked out when you go under that 50 pound mark, you just need to be there to sign-up in the first place. That way any overweight person that goes into the gym knows that everyone else there is in the same situation or has been in the same situation. Why doesn’t such a place exist? Or does such a place exist? I realize the argument would be that fat people don’t go to the gym, so a gym just for fat people wouldn’t be profitable. But I think the problem is a lot of overweight people, especially women, are very self-conscious and don’t want to exercise in front of people who haven’t been in their position. At least that’s my theory.

It’s a billion dollar idea people! Someone swipe it.

This episode of The Biggest Loser was definitely missing something. And that something is some crazy Tracey antics. The majority of this episode focused on the other team’s trip home so Tracey was in the background for most of the show. So it was kind of like a Family Matters episode with no Urkel.

• The episode started off with a challenge for an unknown prize. The contestants had to dig treasure chests out of the beach. I was waiting for the obvious “booty” joke to be made, but it never came (for fat people the majority of the contestants on The Biggest Loser have little to no sense of humor). The winning team got to decide if they wanted to go home for the week or if they wanted to send the other team home. This was a pretty good prize, but I had kind of hoped after 45 minutes of killing themselves shoveling deep into the sand that the prize would have turned out to be something like “the satisfaction of doing a good job” or “the joy of victory.” They need to toy with these people a little more than they do.
• So one team went home for the week and their families greeted them with barbecues and trips to Mexican restaurants that specialize in bowls of melted cheese. Way to be supportive! I don’t know if the producers encourage the families to go out of their way to tempt their returning family member, but they must right? Or are people just naturally that oblivious?
• The in-show ad this week was for Subway. Did you know that their seven worst-tasting sandwiches are very low in fat and calories? It’s true. And if you ask them to “scoop out the bread” they are even lower in calories. If you think that’s a clever tip for lowering calories when you’re eating out, you may like these others:

1. When you order french-fries at McDonald’s, ask for them frozen. You save a lot of calories if they’re not deep-fried.
2. Bring your own romaine lettuce to taco-bell and ask them to use that instead of tortillas for your tacos and burritos.
3. Instead of ordering a meal at Kentucky Fried Chicken, ask if you can just suck on some of the bones from the trash-can. Better yet, just lick the menu.

I spent the last week in Las Vegas.

There are certainly other cities in the world that are better known for their food, but I don’t know if any city in the world is more devoted to the act of gorging oneself to sickness. It’s a city of buffets the way Venice is a city of canals.

Now, I guess this is just common sense, but the food at a buffet isn’t very good. And that would be fine if the buffet costs 10 bucks, but these were 30 and 40 dollar buffets. And if it’s not good food, what exactly are you paying for? Well, you’re paying for variety. So you have to end up making up for the fact that the food isn’t very good by eating a lot of it which is kind of ridiculous.

But I certainly fell into that trap. I went to four buffets over the course of the week, and each time I felt excited by all the possibilities, but then just left feeling sick and ashamed. Like a pedophile at a boy scout jamboree.

Some of the people you see at these buffets will really turn you off towards eating. At least it did me. My last day there I went to the seafood buffet at the Rio hotel. It was 40 dollars for all the shrimp cocktail, crab legs, and mini-lobster tails you could eat. One mother-daughter combo was sitting across from me and they were easily in the 300-400 pound range each. They continually went to the buffet and came back with piles of food and proceeded to glumly stuff their faces. Certainly I’m no one to judge someone for being overweight, but these two with their mullet-y perms and elastic-waisted pants were getting on my nerves. I don’t know if it was a situation where I saw some of myself in their unbounded gluttony or if I was just feeling particularly misanthropic that day. I just remember going to take a bite of crab-leg and freezing half-way as the mom returned from the buffet with a plate that was literally stacked a foot high with food. I sat there glowering and muttering under my breath. The joke was on me though as I eventually looked down to see that drawn butter was dripping all over my shirt.

I encourage everyone on a diet to go to Vegas. There is no better place to see the status of your relationship with food is. It’s kind of like going to a nude beach in Brazil to test your relationship with your wife.

I went primarily to visit friends and didn’t do much gambling — essentially just breaking even over the course of the week. I came home to find I had broken even on the scale as well, and after eating out every meal for the past week in Vegas, I will consider that a success.

[Note: This post is long. And it's not particularly amusing or entertaining. It's just my attempt to quantify a technique I'm using to lose weight that I think may benefit others. If you're looking for amusement, skip this one.]

I don’t really get too into the specifics of my diet here, because my diet is very much a product of me as a person. And while I think I could tailor it to some other person, it would then be suitable to that one other person, and just as useless to everyone else reading this. However there are some aspects of what I’m doing that I think can be applied universally. This post is about one of those techniques I call Island Hopping.  (I’m not a big fan of made-up diet terminology that you see a lot in books and websites (usually with the TM symbol after it). But I just need an easy way to refer to this technique and Island Hopping makes sense, so that’s what I’m going to use.)

There are three main benefits to this technique:

• It makes it easier to start your weight-loss program.
• It eliminates or at least lessens the impact of plateaus in weight loss.
• It will help prevent the situation where a person loses a bunch of weight, then gains it all back. (At least, I speculate that it will help with that.)

This isn’t something revolutionary, in fact it’s probably fairly intuitive. But I think it’s probably the opposite of the way most people attempt to lose weight.

For you young’uns who haven’t heard the term before. Island Hopping was the technique the Allied forces used in WWII to attack Japan. You couldn’t just fly to Japan and drop some bombs and fly back. So the US needed to take over Japanese occupied islands one by one until the Japanese mainland was in the range of American bombers. This strategy (also known as leapfrogging because the US would skip over the most strongly held Japanese islands along the way) presented a series of smaller goals that needed to be accomplished in order to reach the main target, and gave them a series of fall-back positions along the way.

You see where I’m going.

So the weight loss idea is to set up mini-goals along the way to your big goal. That, of course, is nothing new. But the problem I see is that most people just set arbitrary mini-goals that are essentially just sign-posts along the way to their main goal. I don’t think that’s super helpful. I think these goals need to represent a shift in the methodology you’re using to lose the weight. They need to have some significance.

Here are the things you need to know to set this up.

• Your weight
• Your goal weight
• The calorie limit you want to stick to
• The maximum amount of exercise you could realistically do per-day for an extended period of time.

For our example, we’ll use a woman named Carmen. She’s 5 feet tall and weighs 150 pounds. Her goal weight is 100 pounds. (I’m just making this lady up, and chose these numbers for the sake of making the math easy. Please don’t write me and tell me 100 pounds is too low. Please.) Her calorie limit is 1200 per day. And if she juggled around her schedule she could make time for 2 hours of exercise during the day. (We’ll say an aerobics DVD in the morning, a half-hour walk on her lunch break, 30 minutes in the gym after work, and a half hour walk at night.)

Now, when most people get motivated to lose weight, they immediately drop their calories and work in as much exercise as they can get. That sounds great, but I think it has its flaws, and I’ll explain why later (I’ll refer to this as the Traditional Method).

For Island Hopping, you need to come up with multiple levels of attack that increase in intensity. The first level is diet alone. The second level is diet plus 30 minutes of exercise. The third level is diet plus 60 minutes of exercise. And so on until you reach your limit of time you can devote to exercise per day.

So, Carmen would have 5 levels of attack:

1. Diet of 1200 calories per day
2. 1200 calories plus 30 minutes of exercise
3. 1200 calories plus 60 minutes of exercise
4. 1200 calories plus 90 minutes of exercise
5. 1200 calories plus 120 minutes of exercise

Okay, next step. We take the number of pounds Carmen has to lose (50) and divide it by the number of levels she has (5) and subtract that answer (10) from her current weight, and that new number becomes the first goal. Her current weight is 150 so her first goal — or island, in this analogy — would be 140.

Now we’re getting somewhere. The last bit of planning that needs to be done is Carmen has to come up with a realistic amount of time she wants to give herself to reach her first goal. Her first goal is ten pounds, so let’s say she gives herself a month to do so. That seems like a doable challenge.

So, all Carmen has to do is spend the first month at Level One on her levels of attack. A 1200 calorie diet. No mandatory exercise.

Remember the three benefits I said about Island Hopping?

Benefit 1: It makes it easier to start dieting.

- In the traditional method you are pushing yourself to your limit from the start with diet and exercise. That’s great when you have that initial burst of motivation. But when that fades you may be tempted to not just exercise a little less, but throw the whole plan in the trash.

- With Island Hopping you are simply cutting calories at first. And any exercise you choose to do is a bonus.

So, Carmen has been at level one for a month. She’s watched her calories and that is all. No mandatory exercise and no need to step on a scale all month. Let’s say she gets on the scale at the end of the month and she has reached her goal, she’s at 140. Excellent. She gets to stick with that level of attack (Level 1) and set a new goal for herself. Remember, to set a goal we take the number of pounds we have to lose and divide it by the number of levels we have available to us. She has 40 to lose and still has 5 levels. So her next goal would be an 8 pound weight loss to get her to 132 pounds. Let’s say she gives herself another month.

At the end of the next month, if she reaches her goal, she just does the same thing again. She still stays at level one and still divides the number of pounds she needs to lose by her 5 levels to set her next goal weight.

But let’s say she doesn’t reach her goal. Let’s say she gets on the scale at the end of the month and weighs 136. Well, it’s just like the war analogy that’s been established. If the goal hasn’t been reached then you need to increase the intensity of your level of attack. And that is what Carmen needs to do. She jumps to the second level in her weight-loss program which is 1200 calories per day and 30 minutes of exercise. But now, when she sets her goal she only has 4 levels of attack left. She loses the first one because it stopped working at the rate she wanted. So she would divide her 36 pounds to lose by 4, to get a goal of 9 pounds.

Benefit #2: It eliminates or lessens the impact of plateaus

- With the traditional method, when you reach a plateau in your weight loss, there isn’t much you can do. You’re already pushing yourself to the limit with diet and exercise, so it can be very frustrating. So you just either continue on without seeing results, or you toss your hands in the air, say “F this” and hunt down a buffet.

- With Island Hopping you always have something in reserve. If you don’t reach your goal, no problem, you just go to the next level. That’s the point of having the levels. And the fact that your intensity level increases as you go means that long-term plateaus are not really an issue.

So that’s pretty much how it works.

1. Determine how much weight you have to lose.
2. Set the number of levels of attack you have, like I’ve shown above.
3. Divide the amount of weight you have to lose by the number of levels you have.
4. Subtract that figure from your current weight. That is your next goal.
5. Determine a reasonable amount of time to reach that goal in.
6. Commit to that level of attack for that amount of time.
7. If at the end of that time period you reach that goal, then stay at the same level and go back to step 3.  If you don’t reach your goal, then the level you’re on disappears. Go to the next level and go to step 3.
8. Eventually get to your goal weight.
9. Celebrate!
10. Clean up from the celebration.
11. See what’s on TV.

What if you’re on your last level and you fail to reach your goal weight? Well, that depends, did you make significant progress towards your goal but just fail to reach it by a little bit? Then just stay at that level and try again. The fact of the matter is, if you give yourself more than an hour a day of exercise, and you’re sticking to your calorie limit most of the time, then you will probably reach your final goal weight before even getting to the last level of attack, so you should be fine.

And when you do get to your goal weight, I think this should help keep you in that area.

Benefit 3: Less chance of backsliding

- Let’s say there’s a guy who went from 280 to 200 pounds using the traditional method. So often what happens is that they’ll gain it all back. If you don’t have significant milestones along the way toward your goal, you’re not going to have those same milestones to help register how far you’ve slipped from your goal. A pound is a pound.  There’s no difference between 207, 229, 254… these are all just pounds you lost along the way so no one really means much more than any other.

- With Island Hopping you really see your progress slipping away. You will see these goals which represented significant changes in the intensity of your weight loss regimen passing you by the wrong way. So when 207 comes along you say, “Oh shit, this where I started exercising 2 hours a day to reach my goal. I need to get back on the ball. ” When you have these significant landmarks which represent real changes to the way you were losing weight it’s hard to let them pass by unnoticed. Backsliding in weight loss is like driving the wrong direction down the highway, away from your goal. If you’re just driving through  Kansas with nothing on either side of you, you don’t register each mile because they all blend into one another. But if you’re highway takes you from the city to the plains to the mountains and along the ocean you pay more attention. I think a big part of weight loss and keeping it off is just paying attention.

Damn, this is a long post. I know that some people will say this is stupid. That people should just work as hard as possible from minute one in order to lose the weight as quick as possible. These people are dumb, and should listen to me because I’m smart. Yes, it’s true, if you lower your calories and exercise the maximum amount you can right off the bat then you will lose weight faster than if you follow this system. But here’s where I’m smart: I know human nature. We’re not programming robots here. And these benefits I’ve listed above are legitimate. But obviously if you don’t see any reason to do things like this then don’t bother with it. It’s just one path of many.

Speaking of programming robots, if this all seems too complicated to you — with the adding and subtracting and division and all that — just know that this is the dissected version to make it clear what is going on. And to spell everything out for people who like things like that. If you don’t like having everything mapped out for you, if this all seems too regimented, then I give to you:

Simplified Island Hopping for Weight Loss

Start slow. Set interim goals for yourself. If you reach those goals, keep doing what you’re doing. If not, increase your intensity a little.  Repeat as necessary.